One of the major
aberrations that could be seen in the nature of antagonist characters of popular cinema in recent times is that antagonists have started looking for
better rationality in the mass murders they are engaged
in. The iconic antagonist characters
such as the Joker (The Dark Knight, 2008;
Director: Christopher Nolan), Ernst
Stavro Blofeld (James Bond Series) or Solomon Lane (Mission Impossible Series), have all been
depicted as the antithesis of their protagonists and who are, in general, megalomaniacs and anarchists attempting to attain world dominance. In the words
of the Joker:
“Introduce
a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos.
I'm an agent of chaos. Chaos is fair.”
However, some of
the recent antagonist characters in mainstream cinema such as Thanos (The Avengers
Series) or Bertrand Zobrist (Inferno, 2016; Director: Ron Howard) seem to have found a bigger and better reason for the mass killings
they are so strongly convinced about. In the words of Thanos:
“When
I’m done, half of humanity will still exist. Perfectly balanced, as all things
should be.”
©
cgmagonline.com
Thanos and Zobrist
believed strongly that the major menace faced by the world is its ever-burgeoning
population, given its limited resources and the only way the world or human beings can survive, is by eliminating half of the world’s population. If not,
people would die out of hunger. In the words of Thanos himself:
“Going
to bed hungry.. scrounging for scraps. Your planet was on the brink of
collapse. I was the one who stopped that. You know what’s happened since then?
The children born have known nothing but full bellies and clear skies. It’s a
paradise.”
These words of
Thanos may sound very familiar to any student of Economics. It might remind them of the classical
literature An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798) and its famous
author Thomas Robert Malthus. Perhaps it would not be wrong to state that the
characters of Thanos and Zobrist appear to be antagonists influenced largely
by the economic concept of Malthusian Catastrophe.
What is Malthusianism
and Malthusian Catastrophe?
A standard
textbook definition of Malthusianism will be that it’s an idea derived from the
economic thought given by the classical thinker Thomas Malthus in his book An
Essay on the Principle of Population (1798) which suggests that the
population growth in the world is exponential while the growth of food supply
is linear. This might lead to a situation known as the Malthusian Catastrophe
in which the population growth will outpace the agricultural growth resulting
in a situation of too many people and too less food. In the words of Thomas Malthus:
"Famine
seems to be the last, the most dreadful resource of nature. The power of
population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for
man, that premature death must in some shape or the other visit the human race. The
vices of mankind are active and able ministers of depopulation. They are the
precursors in the great army of destruction and often finish the dreadful work
themselves. But should they fail in this war of extermination, sickly seasons,
epidemics, pestilence, and plague advance in terrific array, and sweep off
their thousands and tens of thousands. Should success be still incomplete,
gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow levels
the population with the food of the world."
- An
Essay on the Principle of Population. Chapter VII, p. 61
These apocalyptic
like words of Malthus had inspired a lot of scientists and thinkers like Paul R. Ehrlich, as well
as laymen, who become ardent believers of the Malthusian idea and predicted the occurrence of Malthusian
catastrophe in the 20th century. The population explosion that
occurred in many underdeveloped countries in the world gave momentum to this
belief. But the Malthusian Catastrophe never happened. Nevertheless, one
cannot take away the fact that when Malthus wrote his magnum opus, England was
essentially an agrarian economy just engaged in its first industrial
revolution and perhaps he did not anticipate the role technology was to play in
improving the agricultural yield by leaps and bounds in the coming ages. The population growth also
got major checks through continuous major wars, genocides and natural
catastrophes throughout 20th century.
The Malthusian
prediction was rubbished and became largely regarded as a failed proposition in the
mainstream economics literature of the 20th century. But the sudden re-emergence of the idea through popular culture in the 21st century
and the widespread reception it received would force any student of economics
to take a relook at the idea and check if there exists any empirical
possibilities for Malthusianism in the 21st century.
The Empirical
Investigation
A basic
empirical investigation was done using secondary data collected from the World Bank
and FAO database for the period from 1960 to 2017. A preliminary graphical
analyses show that the world population has been steadily increasing, along
with the crop production (in this case, rice and wheat are considered). It was
interesting to observe that while the crop production has been steadily
increasing, the area of cultivation has remained more or less the same or has declined over the
decades which indicates that the rise in production has majorly been due to the
higher yield.
Though a
graphical analysis of the yield showed a clean upward trend, it was
observed that this was occurring at a diminishing rate. Hence the growth rate
of yield was taken for both rice and wheat along with the population. A trend
analysis using Least square method showed the growth rates are on a downward
trend. A forecast based on the estimates provided a very interesting result.
The forecast showed that if the present trend continues, the conditional mean
of rice yield growth rate and wheat yield growth rate would become zero by the year 2040 and 2050 respectively. Though the population growth rates are also on
a decline, the forecast shows the conditional mean of population growth rate to
become zero by only 2070.
Assuming that
the area of production and yield for rice do not fall but remain constant at
the 2040 level and the same for wheat remain constant at 2050 level, the per capita
crop production was calculated. The results showed a steady decline in the per
capita crop production post-2040 and this decline escalates post-2050. Assuming
that the population growth rate goes negative post-2070, the situation of per
capita crop production can reverse. However, the result suggests that the
period between 2040 to 2050, if the present trend continues, shall result in a
period of very high inflation and the period between 2050 to 2070 may turn out
to be a period of severe food crisis. Looking beyond the food-population relationship,
an exponential forecast shows that the per capita habitable area shall also reduce
from 80,000 sq. ft in 2018 to 40,000 sq. ft by 2060.
Both these
findings are only possibilities provided the prevailing conditions and trend
persist. The possibility of a food crisis can be averted with another green
revolution which looks very much a possibility with the advent of nanotechnology. The steep decline
in the per capita land availability is a bitter reality but can be managed through the construction of more vertical cities replacing horizontal.
Conclusion
There, of course, do
exist an impending possibility of a food crisis in the near future. But through
another technological revolution, the crisis can be very well be averted. Hence
the growing ideology promulgated through characters like Thanos and Zobrist,
which gained quick popularity among the present-day youth, is without any doubt
too farfetched and extremist in nature. However, if the developing countries in
the world which would be housing around 85 per cent of the world population by
2030, do not adopt these technological and structural changes with immediate urgency then the scenario
could be a little scary. As a recent FAO report suggested, “hundreds of
millions will remain hungry” post-2030. Then perhaps Thomas Robert Malthus will
be back in business, once again.
(The article has used only basic data analysis methods. The forecasts are based on Least square estimates uncorrected for any assumption violations. Hence the precision can be affected due to biased estimates.)
(The article has used only basic data analysis methods. The forecasts are based on Least square estimates uncorrected for any assumption violations. Hence the precision can be affected due to biased estimates.)
The line of thinking is absolutely befitting the context now and very realistic. The prognosis for the world in terms of food and land share sounds inevitable.
ReplyDeleteThe analysis also brings to notice the problem that the developing world has to turn it's attention to and the highest priority that it has to be accorded to, which is but just technology.
Thank you so much Sir for your words of encouragement.
DeleteIn the light of the Second Green Revolution debates, this investigation throws good insight into the pressing need for nanotechnology to combat peak oil crises and the emphasis on vertical farming to combat food shortages and inflation.
ReplyDeleteThe spark drawn from the words of Thanos and Zobrist adds more flavour to the way cinema could trigger creativity in the ideologies of the 21st century.
- Poovitha Murugasamy
Thank you so much Poovitha.
ReplyDeleteWell, we do seem to be living as if the world will end in 2050. We don't see beyond that. The problem, as I see, is not so much the absolute food production (and as Sen has pointed out absolute scarcity is rare), but the quality of the food that is produced. Whenever we talk in terms of trends, whether its jobs or food or population, its the quality of it that makes all the difference; not just the quantity. Thanos and Zobrist parallel to revived interest in Malthus is interesting!
ReplyDelete