The abrogation of Article 370, along with its other political and
social objectives, has a declared objective to improve the economic condition
of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K). Despite the poetic sobriquets like
“Paradise on Earth” and “Switzerland of India”, poverty plagues the people of
Kashmir because the state’s economy is in shambles. The erratic economic growth
of the state is perhaps one of the most disappointing growth stories of the
Indian economy. The volatility in the growth of the state GDP is such that it
fell from 34 per cent to two per cent in three years from 2011 to 2014 and
again climbed to 19 per cent in 2015 (see Fig 1). While agriculture has
traditionally been the mainstay of the economy and provides the largest
employment, the tourism sector has not gained momentum in Kashmir in a manner
that justifies its potential. Moreover, industrial development in the state is
weak. Only the service sector has grown over the years.
To comprehend the economy of J&K it is necessary to compare the
state with the other states in India. However, the country’s northern-most
border state is unique from its counterparts across the country and therefore
challenges characterize comparison. J&K is the fifth-largest state with
222,236 sq km but has the 19th largest population with 12,541,302 people prior
to the bifurcation. Hence it will be a methodological error to randomly compare
the J&K economy with any other state with either a similar land area or
population size. For instance, the only states with similar size of territory
are Uttar Pradesh with 240,928 sq km and Gujarat with 196,024 sq km. But UP has
the highest population with 199,812,341 people among the Indian states and
Gujarat has the ninth-largest population at 60,439,692 people, which is 16
times and five times more than the population of J&K, respectively.
Beyond the population and size of the territory, J&K also has a
distinct environment, geographic and topographical characteristics, which make
it methodologically inappropriate to compare with any states that do not
possess these homogeneous characteristics. Therefore, the only feasible and
appropriate methodology would be to compare the state with three of its
neighbours namely Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand. It is true that
these states are smaller in the area compared to J&K. But their population
size, geographical characteristics and climatic conditions are largely similar
to J&K. Data from India Meteorological Department suggests that the four
states jointly experience severe winter from November to March and records the
lowest temperatures in India during the same period. The four states also
jointly come under the impact of the Western Disturbances (WD) which causes
heavy rain in their low-lying areas and heavy snowfall in the mountainous
areas, causing significant influence on the agriculture of these states,
particularly for the Rabi crops. Table 1 provides a comparison of J&K with
Punjab, Himachal and Uttarakhand on certain important geographical,
demographical and economic factors.
Table
1: Comparison of J&K with neighbouring states
Factors
|
J&K
|
Punjab
|
Himachal Pradesh
|
Uttarakhand
|
Area in sq. Km (2016)
|
2,22,236
|
50362
|
55673
|
53483
|
Pop (in Cr) (2016)
|
1.25
|
2.7
|
0.68
|
1
|
Sex Ratio (2016)
|
890
|
895
|
972
|
963
|
Nominal GDP (In Lakh Cr.)
(2016)
|
1.27
|
5.18
|
1.26
|
2.14
|
NSDP Per capita (in
Lakhs) (2016)
|
0.94
|
1.53
|
1.76
|
1.9
|
Literacy Rate (2011)
|
68.7
|
76.6
|
83.7
|
79.6
|
Poverty rate (2013)
|
10.35
|
8.26
|
8.06
|
11.26
|
HDI (Rank among
states)
|
0.684 (17)
|
0.721 (8)
|
0.72 (9)
|
0.67 (19)
|
Urban Unemployment
(per cent) (2016)
|
10
|
7.7
|
8.7
|
9.5
|
Property rates (Avg.
price/ sq. ft.) (2018)
|
2,300 (Srinagar)
|
78,505 (Chandigarh)
|
7,887 (Simla)
|
11,742 (Dehradun)
|
Number of
Factories (2011-12)
|
861
|
12593
|
2489
|
14090
|
Financial Inclusion
(CRISIL Inclusix Scores) (2016)
|
47.8
|
70.9
|
72.3
|
69
|
Source: From various publications of Govt. of India
and RBI.
Economic growth
Though J&K’s neighbours are one-fourth the area before its
bifurcation, the state’s 2016 Nominal State Domestic Product (NSDP) figures are
astonishingly lower in comparison with its neighbours. While the NSDP of J&K
in 2016 was only Rs.1.27 lakh crores, Punjab and Uttarakhand registered NSDP of
Rs.5.18 lakh cr. and Rs. 2.14 lakh cr. respectively. Only Himachal Pradesh
which has half J&K’s population had similar NSDP figures of Rs 1.26 lakh
cr. Data suggests that Himachal and Uttarakhand which more closely resembles
the topography of J&K experienced faster economic growth than J&K since
2001 (see Fig 2).
The major source of revenue for the state has been the grants-in-aid
from the Government of India. Historically, the Govt of India has provided J&K
with the highest grants-in-aid in comparison to any other states in India and
the trend of grants-in-aid is provided as Figure 3.
Source: RBI
A comparison of successive governments at the centre shows that
irrespective of the political parties that have ruled the centre, the Government
of India has only increased the grants-in-aid towards J&K over the period
of time (see Table 2).
Table 2: Grants-in-aid to Jammu and Kashmir during the periods of various Central Governments
UNION
GOVERNMENTS
|
GRANTS
IN AID (₹ Crore)
|
Narasimha
Rao (1991-96)
|
8354
|
A B Vajpayee
(1998 -2003)
|
22200
|
Manmohan
Singh 1 (2004 -2008)
|
37757
|
Manmohan
Singh 2 (2009-2013)
|
66727
|
Narendra
Modi (2014-2019)
|
129628
|
Source: Computed by the author using RBI data
Human Development
The Human Development Index (HDI) rankings of the states show that all
the neighbour states except Uttarakhand have high HDI ranks compared to J&K.
While J&K ranked 17 in the HDI rankings for Indian states in 2018; Punjab
and Himachal ranked 8 and 9 respectively. The literacy rate in J&K is at 68
per cent, which is much lower than the national average of 74 per cent as per
Census of 2011. Importantly J&K with a comparatively lower population suffers
a high poverty rate of 10.35 per cent.
Industrial growth
Industries in J&K have not gained traction due to lack of
investments. The state received its first-ever foreign direct investment with
an initial investment of Rs 1500 crores only in February 2018. According to the
Annual Survey of Industries report 2011-12, there are only 861 factories in J&K
while its smaller neighbour Himachal has 2,489 factories. Corruption is a major
impediment that prevents investors from investing in the state. The Centre for
Media Studies (CMS) in its annual corruption study – CMS India Corruption Study
2017 – has placed Jammu and Kashmir along with Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra
Pradesh as most corrupt among 20 surveyed states in India.
Agriculture
Agriculture contributes 21 per cent to the state’s domestic product,
providing 70 per cent of the employment. Wheat, rice and maize are the major
crops grown in J&K. The same crops are also the major crops grown in
Punjab, Himachal as well as Uttarakhand. The Ministry of Agriculture data
2014-15 suggests that while the yield of food grains in Punjab, Himachal and
Uttarakhand were 4144 kg/ha, 2011 kg/ha and 1824 kg/ha, J&K registered a
yield of only 1379 kg/ha. In the same year, Punjab, Himachal and Uttarakhand
had the yield of 4492 kg/ha, 1800 kg/ha and 1902 kg/ha respectively for wheat,
while J&K’s yield was only 1200 kg/ha. Rice yield was also the lowest for J&K
among the four states with 1710 kg/ha, while Punjab, Himachal and Uttarakhand
registered yields of 3838 kg/ha, 1751 kg/ha and 2313 kg/ha respectively.
Considering the fact that the climatic pattern and topographical conditions of
Himachal and Uttarakhand with J&K are mostly similar, such low yield in the
major crops of J&K is a cause of worry.
Land Value
Lower population density coupled with the restriction imposed by
Article 370 on non-Kashmiris to buy and sell land in the state has resulted in
the abysmally low property prices in the state. While the average land price is
Rs 2,300 per sq. ft. in the state capital, Srinagar, the equivalent in
Himachal’s capital Simla is three times higher.
Unemployment
Today J&K suffers from 10 per cent urban unemployment which is the
highest compared to its four neighbour states. The Economic Survey of J&K
highlights that youth unemployment poses the biggest threat faced to the state
economy. The total unemployment figures of the state being 5.3 per cent,
indicates that the rural sector provides the majority of the employment. An
increase in the young population, low literacy levels clubbed with stagnation
in the tourism sector and slow growth of industries has resulted in the higher
urban and youth unemployment in the state.
Financial Inclusion
J&K has also performed poorly in financial inclusion. The state
ranks 28th in the Crisil Inclusix Index, while Punjab, Himachal and Uttarakhand
have ranked 11, 10 and 12 respectively. This shows the lack of availability of
formal banking systems and financial connectivity with the public. The low
financial inclusion shows the lack of credit availability for industries,
agriculture and business in the state which can cause a major impediment in its
economic growth.
Tourism
One of the major disappointments for J&K has been the tourism
sector. With the tremendous tourism potential offered by its serene topography
and climatic conditions, data suggests that the state could never fully tap on
to it due to the political instabilities and turbulences. Militancy has also
been a major factor that impacted the growth of the tourism sector in Kashmir
(see Fig 4). The data suggest that there exists a very strong negative
relationship of militancy with the decline in tourist arrivals. In 2017, while
Himachal saw a 6.25 per cent increase in tourist arrivals, with a total of
19.60 million tourists of which 471 thousand were foreign tourists, Uttarakhand
received a total of 34.72 million tourists of which 142 thousand were
foreigners. However, during the same period, J&K could receive only 14.32
million tourists of which 79 thousand were foreigners.
Conclusion
The political motives and righteousness in the move by the Government
of India to abrogate Article 370 is being questioned by many. But there can be
no denial that the economy of J&K is in shambles. The J&K economy over
the decades has been largely propelled by the generous grants-in-aid from the
Union government. But what data suggests is that these grants-in-aid have not
been able to bring about any changes in the life of the people of the state due
to the rampant corruption that exists at every level in the state government.
Even J&K’s smaller neighbours with similar adverse geographical
characteristics and climatic conditions have overtaken the state in economic
growth and social development. The industrial development of the state is a
major concern with no investments from outside reaching the state. The literacy
rate is lower than the national average and urban unemployment is a major concern.
Political turmoil and militancy issues have been the major roadblocks for the
state in attaining its true potential growth.
The state requires a major revamp with respect to its investment policy,
industrial policy, land ownership policy, tourism promotion and agricultural
practices One can only hope that the recent developments would open up doors
for investments and businesses into the state that could provide the big push
that the economy of J&K is desperately wanting. But however, if this move
backfires, then it would only lead to a further worsening of the economic
status quo.
(I thank my student Mr Mohammad Saiflan Aijaz for the help rendered in
the data collection)